<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lace Answers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.plimoth.org/embroidery-blog/2008/10/18/lace-answers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.plimoth.org/embroidery-blog/2008/10/18/lace-answers/</link>
	<description>The blog for Plimoth Plantation's 17 Century embroidered jacket project.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 13:44:35 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Carolyn H.</title>
		<link>http://www.plimoth.org/embroidery-blog/2008/10/18/lace-answers/comment-page-1/#comment-2127</link>
		<dc:creator>Carolyn H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 23:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plimoth.org/embroidery-blog/?p=1149#comment-2127</guid>
		<description>Tricia, your comments confirm my impressions about finishing the ends, impressions that I got from examining the lace at the MMA.  I came away with a conviction that the way the ends were finished amounted to: &quot;anyway they could&quot;.

I&#039;m not entirely sure about Colleen&#039;s hypothosis that the only way to have the knots at the ends would be to undo some of the lace, or to have the lace custom made for the jacket.  In fact, one way that you would see knots would be if the lace was worked (to order) a certain length, and knotted.  If the lacemaker then skipped a repeat or so and knotted the threads just above the pins that begin the next length, you might see knots at one or both ends.

All just speculation, of course.

I can&#039;t wait to see the photos!

Carolyn</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tricia, your comments confirm my impressions about finishing the ends, impressions that I got from examining the lace at the MMA.  I came away with a conviction that the way the ends were finished amounted to: &#8220;anyway they could&#8221;.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not entirely sure about Colleen&#8217;s hypothosis that the only way to have the knots at the ends would be to undo some of the lace, or to have the lace custom made for the jacket.  In fact, one way that you would see knots would be if the lace was worked (to order) a certain length, and knotted.  If the lacemaker then skipped a repeat or so and knotted the threads just above the pins that begin the next length, you might see knots at one or both ends.</p>
<p>All just speculation, of course.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t wait to see the photos!</p>
<p>Carolyn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helen</title>
		<link>http://www.plimoth.org/embroidery-blog/2008/10/18/lace-answers/comment-page-1/#comment-2126</link>
		<dc:creator>Helen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 18:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plimoth.org/embroidery-blog/?p=1149#comment-2126</guid>
		<description>I undertstand the frustration, a friend of mine did some research on some lace that was in the Met, she had to sign a non-disclosure/non-publication waiver before she was allowed to view her samples and do her research (reverse engineering a pattern from an extant example, including figuring out the proper thread size to use).  I have seen her work, and it would be nice for other people to see it, but I also understand the museum&#039;s desire to keep control of what is &quot;theirs&quot; (the images and the items they portray).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I undertstand the frustration, a friend of mine did some research on some lace that was in the Met, she had to sign a non-disclosure/non-publication waiver before she was allowed to view her samples and do her research (reverse engineering a pattern from an extant example, including figuring out the proper thread size to use).  I have seen her work, and it would be nice for other people to see it, but I also understand the museum&#8217;s desire to keep control of what is &#8220;theirs&#8221; (the images and the items they portray).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Follansbee</title>
		<link>http://www.plimoth.org/embroidery-blog/2008/10/18/lace-answers/comment-page-1/#comment-2123</link>
		<dc:creator>Follansbee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 23:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plimoth.org/embroidery-blog/?p=1149#comment-2123</guid>
		<description>Tricia

I enjoy the parts about your trip to examine the original artifacts. good stuff...there is no way anything can substitute for the hands-on examination of the object. Ideally more of your embroiderers would at least have some access to period work, so they could really see &amp; feel what they are trying to capture. 

the phrase &quot;just goes to show that when there is so much going on visually, these rough spots just don’t show up!&quot; sounds familiar. 

It&#039;s just so frustrating that the institutions that hold these objects won&#039;t let you post pictures, reading it without images is really irritating. Just a general complaint about museums these days. At least you got to see the jacket &amp; panel first-hand without plexi in front of them. win some lose some, I guess. 
PF</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tricia</p>
<p>I enjoy the parts about your trip to examine the original artifacts. good stuff&#8230;there is no way anything can substitute for the hands-on examination of the object. Ideally more of your embroiderers would at least have some access to period work, so they could really see &amp; feel what they are trying to capture. </p>
<p>the phrase &#8220;just goes to show that when there is so much going on visually, these rough spots just don’t show up!&#8221; sounds familiar. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s just so frustrating that the institutions that hold these objects won&#8217;t let you post pictures, reading it without images is really irritating. Just a general complaint about museums these days. At least you got to see the jacket &amp; panel first-hand without plexi in front of them. win some lose some, I guess.<br />
PF</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colleen</title>
		<link>http://www.plimoth.org/embroidery-blog/2008/10/18/lace-answers/comment-page-1/#comment-2121</link>
		<dc:creator>Colleen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 20:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plimoth.org/embroidery-blog/?p=1149#comment-2121</guid>
		<description>That end looks nice because I think it&#039;s a fold...both ends of the thread were wound onto bobbins and then the center is the end, so it&#039;s nice and neat.   If you are buying pre-made yardage, only one person would get that bit, unless you bought the whole piece.

In order to tie off the lace, they would have had to cut the lace, then undo a bit, to get enough slack to knot...amazing, I&#039;d think it was too expensive to do that!   Unless it was made for the jacket?   I wouldn&#039;t expect that, either.   I want a time machine!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That end looks nice because I think it&#8217;s a fold&#8230;both ends of the thread were wound onto bobbins and then the center is the end, so it&#8217;s nice and neat.   If you are buying pre-made yardage, only one person would get that bit, unless you bought the whole piece.</p>
<p>In order to tie off the lace, they would have had to cut the lace, then undo a bit, to get enough slack to knot&#8230;amazing, I&#8217;d think it was too expensive to do that!   Unless it was made for the jacket?   I wouldn&#8217;t expect that, either.   I want a time machine!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
