<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nineteen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.plimoth.org/embroidery-blog/2008/06/20/nineteen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.plimoth.org/embroidery-blog/2008/06/20/nineteen/</link>
	<description>The blog for Plimoth Plantation's 17 Century embroidered jacket project.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 02:44:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sandy</title>
		<link>http://www.plimoth.org/embroidery-blog/2008/06/20/nineteen/comment-page-1/#comment-1752</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 03:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plimoth.org/embroidery-blog/2008/06/20/nineteen/#comment-1752</guid>
		<description>Earl Grey cupcakes? As in, tea is an ingredient - or a special recipe favored by Lord Grey?  (If the latter, of course, which Lord Grey and how old is the recipe?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earl Grey cupcakes? As in, tea is an ingredient &#8211; or a special recipe favored by Lord Grey?  (If the latter, of course, which Lord Grey and how old is the recipe?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robbin Douglas</title>
		<link>http://www.plimoth.org/embroidery-blog/2008/06/20/nineteen/comment-page-1/#comment-1747</link>
		<dc:creator>Robbin Douglas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 05:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plimoth.org/embroidery-blog/2008/06/20/nineteen/#comment-1747</guid>
		<description>The forum still exists.  This is a direct link to it: http://plimoth.org/embroidery-blog/forum/ but you can find it as the second link in the right column.  Blogs are listed first, then Links.  The link to the forum says Embroiderer&#039;s Story Forum.

This is an excellent place for such a discussion and any others related to items posted here.  If you want new forum areas, please let me know.  It&#039;s a rather boring job moderating it right now!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The forum still exists.  This is a direct link to it: <a href="http://plimoth.org/embroidery-blog/forum/" rel="nofollow">http://plimoth.org/embroidery-blog/forum/</a> but you can find it as the second link in the right column.  Blogs are listed first, then Links.  The link to the forum says Embroiderer&#8217;s Story Forum.</p>
<p>This is an excellent place for such a discussion and any others related to items posted here.  If you want new forum areas, please let me know.  It&#8217;s a rather boring job moderating it right now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda V</title>
		<link>http://www.plimoth.org/embroidery-blog/2008/06/20/nineteen/comment-page-1/#comment-1746</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 05:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plimoth.org/embroidery-blog/2008/06/20/nineteen/#comment-1746</guid>
		<description>Forum?  What forum?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forum?  What forum?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carolyn</title>
		<link>http://www.plimoth.org/embroidery-blog/2008/06/20/nineteen/comment-page-1/#comment-1745</link>
		<dc:creator>Carolyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 02:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plimoth.org/embroidery-blog/2008/06/20/nineteen/#comment-1745</guid>
		<description>I second the question from Colleen.  I have always heard that tatting didn&#039;t develop until well into the 19th century.  Many have been the attempts to document earlier instances of tatting, and many have been the failures.

A more appropriate place to ask this would have been the Forum, but it seems to have disappeared.  Has it been removed?  There wasn&#039;t a lot of traffic, but it was a good place for this kind of discussion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I second the question from Colleen.  I have always heard that tatting didn&#8217;t develop until well into the 19th century.  Many have been the attempts to document earlier instances of tatting, and many have been the failures.</p>
<p>A more appropriate place to ask this would have been the Forum, but it seems to have disappeared.  Has it been removed?  There wasn&#8217;t a lot of traffic, but it was a good place for this kind of discussion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colleen</title>
		<link>http://www.plimoth.org/embroidery-blog/2008/06/20/nineteen/comment-page-1/#comment-1744</link>
		<dc:creator>Colleen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 01:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plimoth.org/embroidery-blog/2008/06/20/nineteen/#comment-1744</guid>
		<description>I really enjoyed seeing the threads article in the Plimouth magazine which came today....but it _also_ said that Kate had recently learned to tat, which was 18th C lace.   Have you folks got new information about how early tatting was?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really enjoyed seeing the threads article in the Plimouth magazine which came today&#8230;.but it _also_ said that Kate had recently learned to tat, which was 18th C lace.   Have you folks got new information about how early tatting was?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
