<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nineteen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.plimoth.org/embroidery-blog/2008/06/20/nineteen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.plimoth.org/embroidery-blog/2008/06/20/nineteen/</link>
	<description>The blog for Plimoth Plantation's 17 Century embroidered jacket project.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sandy</title>
		<link>http://www.plimoth.org/embroidery-blog/2008/06/20/nineteen/#comment-1752</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 03:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plimoth.org/embroidery-blog/2008/06/20/nineteen/#comment-1752</guid>
		<description>Earl Grey cupcakes? As in, tea is an ingredient - or a special recipe favored by Lord Grey?  (If the latter, of course, which Lord Grey and how old is the recipe?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earl Grey cupcakes? As in, tea is an ingredient - or a special recipe favored by Lord Grey?  (If the latter, of course, which Lord Grey and how old is the recipe?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robbin Douglas</title>
		<link>http://www.plimoth.org/embroidery-blog/2008/06/20/nineteen/#comment-1747</link>
		<dc:creator>Robbin Douglas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 05:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plimoth.org/embroidery-blog/2008/06/20/nineteen/#comment-1747</guid>
		<description>The forum still exists.  This is a direct link to it: http://plimoth.org/embroidery-blog/forum/ but you can find it as the second link in the right column.  Blogs are listed first, then Links.  The link to the forum says Embroiderer's Story Forum.

This is an excellent place for such a discussion and any others related to items posted here.  If you want new forum areas, please let me know.  It's a rather boring job moderating it right now!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The forum still exists.  This is a direct link to it: <a href="http://plimoth.org/embroidery-blog/forum/" rel="nofollow">http://plimoth.org/embroidery-blog/forum/</a> but you can find it as the second link in the right column.  Blogs are listed first, then Links.  The link to the forum says Embroiderer&#8217;s Story Forum.</p>
<p>This is an excellent place for such a discussion and any others related to items posted here.  If you want new forum areas, please let me know.  It&#8217;s a rather boring job moderating it right now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda V</title>
		<link>http://www.plimoth.org/embroidery-blog/2008/06/20/nineteen/#comment-1746</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 05:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plimoth.org/embroidery-blog/2008/06/20/nineteen/#comment-1746</guid>
		<description>Forum?  What forum?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forum?  What forum?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carolyn</title>
		<link>http://www.plimoth.org/embroidery-blog/2008/06/20/nineteen/#comment-1745</link>
		<dc:creator>Carolyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 02:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plimoth.org/embroidery-blog/2008/06/20/nineteen/#comment-1745</guid>
		<description>I second the question from Colleen.  I have always heard that tatting didn't develop until well into the 19th century.  Many have been the attempts to document earlier instances of tatting, and many have been the failures.

A more appropriate place to ask this would have been the Forum, but it seems to have disappeared.  Has it been removed?  There wasn't a lot of traffic, but it was a good place for this kind of discussion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I second the question from Colleen.  I have always heard that tatting didn&#8217;t develop until well into the 19th century.  Many have been the attempts to document earlier instances of tatting, and many have been the failures.</p>
<p>A more appropriate place to ask this would have been the Forum, but it seems to have disappeared.  Has it been removed?  There wasn&#8217;t a lot of traffic, but it was a good place for this kind of discussion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colleen</title>
		<link>http://www.plimoth.org/embroidery-blog/2008/06/20/nineteen/#comment-1744</link>
		<dc:creator>Colleen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 01:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plimoth.org/embroidery-blog/2008/06/20/nineteen/#comment-1744</guid>
		<description>I really enjoyed seeing the threads article in the Plimouth magazine which came today....but it _also_ said that Kate had recently learned to tat, which was 18th C lace.   Have you folks got new information about how early tatting was?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really enjoyed seeing the threads article in the Plimouth magazine which came today&#8230;.but it _also_ said that Kate had recently learned to tat, which was 18th C lace.   Have you folks got new information about how early tatting was?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
